Practitioner Research as Staff Development: A Facilitator's Guide

Research Meetings and Materials    

Meeting Two: Collecting Research Data
     Session 8: Practice Collecting Data

  • Activity 1: Being a Complete Observer in a Public Setting (1 ½ hrs plus time for participants to travel to/from the observation site.) Working in pairs and individually, participants get first-hand experience gathering data through observation.

  • Activity 2: Rich Data (40 min) small and whole group activity to help participants understand the idea of a rich description and its importance in collecting qualitative data.
     

Activity 1: Being a Complete Observer in a Public Setting*
 
Purpose:  Participants get firsthand experience using observation as a means of collecting data.
 
Time: 1 ½ hrs plus time for participants to travel to/from the observation site.

 
Materials: Observation Assignment handout

Easel, markers, and flip chart paper
Researcher logs or journals

Any public setting for the observation to occur -- a restaurant, a well populated street corner, the public library, a grocery store, the mall, etc. There should be natural public access to the setting and multiple viewing opportunities for participants.

Process

Frame the activity for the group: This activity gives each participant the opportunity to find out how much they can learn, hear, and see through observation. Explain that observations are usually recorded with field notes during or very soon after an event being recorded has occurred. Field notes should be focused and shaped by the research topic. For example, if the research was about students' views of themselves as writers, an observer might take notes on the comments students made about writing during class discussions or conferences.

Now identify a question for participants to focus their observations and note taking. In the 1999-2000 Virginia Research Network, for example, the question that framed this activity was: How are status and hierarchies manifested in the situation observed? View the sample observation notes on this website. Consider doing a friendly critique of these sample field notes before participants depart to carry out their own observations. This will give them a model and may be helpful when they share their notes and respond to their partner's. (Add 30 min to critique the field notes.)

Review the directions for the Observation Assignment with participants. Divide the group in to pairs. Participants should go to the observation setting with a partner but will not collaborate in any way until they have completed recording their observations. Then they will share their notes and compare and contrast their views of the same setting. Suggest that partners can also respond to each other's notes with questions like:

  • What could be clearer or more descriptive?
  • What would you like to know more about?

This portion of the activity can occur while partners are together at the site for observation, or once they have returned to the whole group setting.

Reconvene the group to debrief the activity. Us these questions to facilitate a discussion about the participants' experiences and the lessons they learned:

  • How do participants feel about what happened?
  • Were there any surprises?
  • What did they learn about collecting data through observation?
  • What are the implications for their own research situations?

Respond to participants' questions and comments about using observation to collect information and to learn more about a particular subject.

__________________________________________________________________
*Adapted from: Drennon, C.E. (1998) Practitioner Inquiry for Staff Development and Program Improvement: A Facilitation Guide for Local Adult Literacy Programs, Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia. Further credit goes to Janesick, Valerie J. (1998) Stretching Exercises for Qualitative Researchers, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Top of page

Activity 2: Rich Data: Learning How To Write Descriptively*

Purpose:  This activity is designed to help participants understand the idea of a rich description and its importance in qualitative data collection.
 
Time: 40 min
 
Materials: A kiwi, paper plate, knife, and napkins

Process:

Explain to participants that a skillful observer will produce rich data. "Rich data" refers to data that describes comprehensively the person, event, object, or situation that a researcher is investigating. Here's how the authors Bogdan and Biklen describe the importance of rich data:

"Rich data or rich field notes are phrases used by experienced fieldworkers to refer to field notes that are well endowed with good description and dialogue relevant to what occurs at the setting and its meaning for participants. Rich data are filled with pieces of evidence, with clues that you begin to put together to make analytical sense out of what you study."

Divide participants into small groups (five to six per group). Give each group has a kiwi fruit, a paper plate, a knife, and napkins.

The group's task is to describe the kiwi as fully as possible. Do this by rounds in which person makes a descriptive statement about the kiwi. For example, if a small group of three people were describing a pineapple, it might go like this:

Person A: "The outside is spiky."
Person B: "The fruit has green leaves."
Person C: "The green leaves are coming out of the top of the fruit."

Each person takes a turn making a descriptive statement about the fruit. Try to take at least 10 turns each. Someone in each group keeps track of the number of turns each person takes.

Try to avoid making evaluative statements about the kiwi. For example, "The kiwi is ugly" is an evaluative statement. Listen closely to each other and try to help each other understand the difference between descriptive and evaluative comments.

Discuss the activity in the large group and extract lessons learned.

________________________________________________________________________
*The Inquiry Facilitators Handbook Pennsylvania Adult Literacy Practitioner Inquiry Network (1998). Further credit goes to Bogdan and Biklen (1992). Qualitative Research for Education, 2nd Ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.


End of session


Session 9: Designing a Whole Research Project

Top of page


Introduction | Research Meetings and Materials | References and Resources | Site Map | Home

Copyright © 2003 The Virginia Adult Learning Resource Center